Re: The situation in Syria
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2021 10:01 am
Hi All,
There has obviously been a change of regime in the US, and I don’t want to get into that whole divisive issue from a political/partisan point of view.
I would, however, like to touch on what it could mean for Syria, and globalist/military-industrial interference in that country.
Firstly, Iran. While far from perfect, it is wrongly singled out as the ‘Number one state sponsor of terror.’ This is patently false. Saudi Arabia is far and away the number one state sponsor of terror, but because Saudi Arabia is in bed with the western countries, it is largely left uncriticised. Moreover, while Iran has undoubtedly sponsored terrorists here or there, so have western countries such as the US, UK, European countries, etc. This has been extensively documented in this forum.
To get to my point, I would like to see some sort of rapprochement between Iran and the west. For the last few years, Iran has been blockaded, provoked, sanctioned, squeezed and bullied by the military-industrial complex based in Washington. But once we cut through the mainstream media propaganda, it’s clear that Iran is not as bad as western darlings like Saudi Arabia. Iran represses Christians, but tolerates their existence. Saudi Arabia does not tolerate their existence. It is illegal to be a Christian in Saudi Arabia, and the penalty is imprisonment, torture and/or death.
Saudi Arabia was also a major sponsor of ISIS, and has always been in bed with fanatics like al-queda. Iran, a Shiite nation, is a sworn enemy of ISIS/al-queda, etc. Iran has backed the Syrian government, which has protected Christians. The western nations, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Israel, etc, have all backed, to one extent or another, the fanatical Christian-killing jihadists in Syria.
In short, it would be nice to see de-escalation with Iran, but that remains to be seen. The flip side of this is Syria, where the two previous US regimes before this newest one ultimately pursued similar policies. I think the best we could probably hope for from the newest US regime is that there is no significant escalation.
That also remains to be seen. I read a very recent report of a US military build-up in and around the oil fields of eastern Syria (the US government is clearly occupying that part of the country to steel the oil. There is no other explanation). There has also been a Russian military build-up in the parts of the country that they are occupying.
While Russia, like everyone else, is also not perfect and has its own agenda, the Russian forces, unlike the western forces, are in Syria at the invitation of the Syrian government.
On top of all of this, Israel continues to act as the official air force of al-queda in Syria, continually bombing the positions of pro-Assad/pro-Iranian/anti-terrorist militias in Syria, sometimes long distances away from the Israeli border.
Of course, the best outcome for Syria, all along, would be for zero interference from outside, and for it to be left alone. This, however, is not the nature of the globalist agenda, new world order.
No articles to post today. I’ll leave it at that. All the best.
There has obviously been a change of regime in the US, and I don’t want to get into that whole divisive issue from a political/partisan point of view.
I would, however, like to touch on what it could mean for Syria, and globalist/military-industrial interference in that country.
Firstly, Iran. While far from perfect, it is wrongly singled out as the ‘Number one state sponsor of terror.’ This is patently false. Saudi Arabia is far and away the number one state sponsor of terror, but because Saudi Arabia is in bed with the western countries, it is largely left uncriticised. Moreover, while Iran has undoubtedly sponsored terrorists here or there, so have western countries such as the US, UK, European countries, etc. This has been extensively documented in this forum.
To get to my point, I would like to see some sort of rapprochement between Iran and the west. For the last few years, Iran has been blockaded, provoked, sanctioned, squeezed and bullied by the military-industrial complex based in Washington. But once we cut through the mainstream media propaganda, it’s clear that Iran is not as bad as western darlings like Saudi Arabia. Iran represses Christians, but tolerates their existence. Saudi Arabia does not tolerate their existence. It is illegal to be a Christian in Saudi Arabia, and the penalty is imprisonment, torture and/or death.
Saudi Arabia was also a major sponsor of ISIS, and has always been in bed with fanatics like al-queda. Iran, a Shiite nation, is a sworn enemy of ISIS/al-queda, etc. Iran has backed the Syrian government, which has protected Christians. The western nations, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Israel, etc, have all backed, to one extent or another, the fanatical Christian-killing jihadists in Syria.
In short, it would be nice to see de-escalation with Iran, but that remains to be seen. The flip side of this is Syria, where the two previous US regimes before this newest one ultimately pursued similar policies. I think the best we could probably hope for from the newest US regime is that there is no significant escalation.
That also remains to be seen. I read a very recent report of a US military build-up in and around the oil fields of eastern Syria (the US government is clearly occupying that part of the country to steel the oil. There is no other explanation). There has also been a Russian military build-up in the parts of the country that they are occupying.
While Russia, like everyone else, is also not perfect and has its own agenda, the Russian forces, unlike the western forces, are in Syria at the invitation of the Syrian government.
On top of all of this, Israel continues to act as the official air force of al-queda in Syria, continually bombing the positions of pro-Assad/pro-Iranian/anti-terrorist militias in Syria, sometimes long distances away from the Israeli border.
Of course, the best outcome for Syria, all along, would be for zero interference from outside, and for it to be left alone. This, however, is not the nature of the globalist agenda, new world order.
No articles to post today. I’ll leave it at that. All the best.