This is a real red-alert update.
Currently dominating mainstream media reports are accusations that the Syrian government has in the last 24 hours used chemical weapons against rebel-held areas to the east of the capital, Damascus.
The accusations all come from 'rebel' groups, and are completely unsubstantiated. But many mainstream media outlets are already reporting on it as if it's an established fact that the Syrian government did this. I have already seen some aggressive journalists calling for the west to finally move in and bomb the country to the ground in response.
This is very, very serious stuff. I admit that I don't know who is responsible for this atrocity, or even if it happened at all. Certainly, the pathologically dishonest mainstream media can't be trusted to tell the truth.
Here is my big question, though; if it really happened, which side benefits? The Syrian government side is widely seen to have the upper hand in the war at this point, and the capital city Damascus was not under threat. Further to this, they know that if they really did use chemical weapons, it would give the west the justification it has long been waiting for to move in, bomb the country to the ground, topple the current government, and install its jihadist proxy force into power. Clearly, the Syrian government would not benefit at all by using chemical weapons, and had no good reason to.
The western-backed rebels, however, are currently not going well in the war. They have long been wishing for the west to give them heavier weapons, and also have long wanted the west to give them direct military support via aerial bombardment and so on, which would then probably be enough to topple the Syrian government. Moreover, the 'rebels' know that if the Syrian government really used chemical weapons on a large scale, this could well be the tipping point that brings the west directly into the conflict. Clearly, the western-backed rebels could greatly benefit if the Syrian government really did use chemical weapons.
The war against Syria is ultimatley a new world order project driven by the western countries. If this chemical weapon atrocity really did happen, it is highly likely that it was carried out by the western-backed 'rebels' with direct assistance from western agents on the ground in Syria, ie. black operations people or intelligence agents from western countries or western-aligned countries.
The lying media, which is completely controlled by the new world order, could then serve its propagandistic role by telling the world that the Syrian government was responsible, which would then give the leaders of the new world order their 'justification' to fulfil their evil objectives with Syria.
Please note, I admit that the above is speculation, and I am not saying for a moment that this is exactly what is happening right now regarding Syria. But this is how the new world order works. And a very similar process has already been used against other countries before, ie. Serbia (1999), Iraq (2003-...) and Libya a couple of years back.
Yes, my speculation above may well not be 100 per cent accurate. But yes, the mainstream media version we are now witnessing is almost guaranteed to be 100 per cent lies.
It will be interesting to see how this pans out. We must pray that the will of the Lord, and not the new world order, ultimately plays out in Syria.
Here is a very good article detailing how incredibly fishy this whole thing is:
http://rt.com/op-edge/syria-gas-attack- ... ganda-796/